PR lessons from Scoot’s flight delay saga

ScootIn this guest post that first appeared on Digimind’s blog, the data intelligence firm suggests there are a few PR lessons to be learned from Scoot’s 22 hour flight delay saga.

On the evening of 20 June, a flight from Singapore to Perth was delayed for more than 22 hours, making it the second flight delay in three days for the budget carrier.

Using our monitoring tool Digimind social, we put our listening ears on how Scoot handled the crisis on the social media front, as well as what lessons we could learn from this incident.

1. Evidence speaks for itself on social media

With social media making it possible for news to spread like wildfire, first-hand accounts of passengers stranded at the airport quickly caught attention online.

In particular, a YouTube video showing angry passengers demanding answers and compensation, after being made to board and disembark the plane several times, highlighted their suffering as well as the airline’s incompetency in handling the situation in an efficient and humane manner.

These few tweets show the dissatisfaction unfold on Twitter.

FlyScoot tweets

Evidently, customers are social media savvy, taking to online platforms to express their dissatisfaction alongside while forcing companies to act on potentially damaging reviews. It is important for companies like Scoot to constantly monitor what is being said about them by customers in real-time, and address them promptly before it proves detrimental to their online reputation.

2. Act fast

It took nearly 3 days before CEO Campbell Wilson finally apologised for the delay on Channel News Asia, with 2-3 updates on the company’s Facebook page. In the world of social media, half a day is considered a long time, let alone 3 days.

By then, online sentiment towards Scoot had taken for the worst, with more than half of online conversations about the airline being negative. Mentions also spiked by almost 100% from 20 – 23 June during the CEO’s online absence.

Twitte Scoot


Had Campbell addressed these issues immediately, it might have mitigated the situation. Putting off addressing your customers suggests disorganisation and insincerity towards them. It is better to have an active social media presence or none at all, instead of an inconsistent one.

3. Act well

For a brand that’s known for staying (relatively) ahead of the social media game, Scoot’s (and Wilson’s) apology was sorely lacking.

Scoot boss

Quoting the Latin phrase “quid pro quo” with regards to not securing accommodation for affected passengers, Wilson failed to explain why passengers were made to deplane twice, as well as the lack of operating crew and staff on hand.

Needless to say, internet users were not pleased and slammed Wilson’s poor answer, including local influencer @mrbrown who added his own twist to his quid pro quo!

FlyScoot tweets

4. Your staff’s social media activities reflect your company’s

To make matters worse, a Scoot stewardess took to her personal Facebook page to chide affected passengers for complaining, even commenting that they should have flown with Singapore Airlines, a national carrier, if they wanted better services.


Regardless of who is at fault, staff must retain a neutral and professional front in a time where the line between personal Facebook accounts and official company pages is becoming more and more blurred.

Employees are like your brand ambassadors, and their online behaviour reflects on the company and affects how it is being perceived. Therefore, companies should invest in training their staff on social media etiquette, or even monitoring their social media activities to avoid similar situations from taking place.

Digimind is a global social media monitoring and competitive intelligence company.


Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella Asia newsletter now.



Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing